Of the various ways of entering the public service, the public examination or
tests and titles is the most democratic, imperfect, of course, however, the most democratic, at least for now, since the establishment of quotas is already a reality in competitions throughout Brazil. There is still no regulatory standard for all federated entities that guides and establishes the scope, limits and impediments for holding public competitions. Given this, the federal government and some states have already created their own legislation aiming to repair the gap.
Meanwhile, we are experiencing real confusion when matter is
concurso público, tais como: critérios estapafúrdios; editais abusivos em termos de exigência de prazos entre a inscrição e a realização da prova; aberrações cometidas pelas bancas examinadoras; edital eivado de irregularidades; vaga para cadastros reserva que nunca serão chamados; candidatos classificados dentro de um certame e que também não são chamados; novo certame para o mesmo cargo durante o prazo de vigência de certame anterior; certames simultâneos, antes mesmo da homologação de certame anterior; cadastro reserva; indeferimento de recursos que apontavam respostas erradas nos gabaritos oficiais; prazos
minimums for candidates to prepare adequately; short deadlines for advertising and registration, limiting competitiveness in the tests; privileged information to groups of candidates on the subjects to be charged; sale of templates; technical insufficiency of some stalls; poorly formulated questions in exams, among many others.

To continue reading the text…